Cultivation of psilocybin mushrooms remains a federal offense in the United States. Content is provided for educational, harm-reduction, and research purposes in jurisdictions where such activity is legal.

The CodexField ManualLegal Status

Legal Status

Psilocybin law in the United States and Canada — federal frameworks, state and provincial reform, and the distinction between decriminalization and legalization. A living reference.

⚠ Not legal advice

This page is an educational summary compiled by the community, not legal advice. Psilocybin law changes frequently; verify the current status with authoritative sources and counsel before acting on anything here. Oldest entry was last reviewed 01 Jun 2026.

Jurisdiction

United States

§ 01Federal Law

Psilocybin and psilocin are Schedule I controlled substances under the federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970, meaning federal authorities classify them as having no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Both claims are at odds with the clinical literature; the scheduling has not caught up.

Federal law applies in every state, on federal property, and in interstate transport. A state can decide not to enforce possession or cultivation under its own laws — as Oregon and Colorado have — but federal agencies (DEA, FBI, U.S. Postal Inspectors) retain jurisdiction. In practice, federal prosecutions of small-scale personal use have been rare; federal enforcement focuses on trafficking, interstate commerce, and activity on federal land.

Spores themselves — which contain no psilocybin — occupy a narrow federal gap and are legal to possess federally for microscopy purposes, though a handful of states (CA, GA, ID) specifically criminalize them.

On 18 April 2026, the President signed an executive order titled Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness, directing the FDA to prioritize psychedelic review, instructing the DEA to reduce research barriers, and allocating $50M in ARPA-H match funding for state psychedelic research. The order does not reschedule psilocybin, but it signals expansion of Right-to-Try pathways to Schedule I substances. On 24 April 2026, the FDA awarded Commissioner's National Priority Vouchers to Compass Pathways' COMP360 (treatment-resistant depression) and Usona Institute's psilocybin (major depressive disorder), the first concrete federal actions implementing the order.

§ 02Decriminalization vs. Legalization

Decriminalization

Removes or lowers criminal penalties for specific acts — usually personal possession of small amounts — without legalizing manufacture, sale, or distribution. The substance remains illegal; prosecution is deprioritized. A police officer may still confiscate, and sale is still a crime. Most US municipal reforms have taken this form.

Legalization

Creates an affirmative legal framework under which the substance can be possessed, manufactured, sold, or administered in specified circumstances. Legalization typically includes a regulator, licensed providers, product-safety requirements, and tax or fee structures. Oregon's Measure 109 and Colorado's Proposition 122 are the only US examples to date.

A state or city can do both: legalize regulated therapeutic use while leaving unregulated personal use either decriminalized or prohibited. Oregon is the clearest example.

§ 03State & Territory Status

  • Maine

    ME
    Recent failure

    LD 1914 (2023), which would have established a regulated therapeutic framework, did not advance.

    Legislation

    • LD 1914 (2023)Psilocybin therapy framework; died in committee.
    Last reviewed 01 Jun 2026
  • Massachusetts

    MA
    Recent failure

    Question 4 (Natural Psychedelic Substances Act) was rejected by voters in November 2024. Possession remains a criminal offense statewide; several cities have deprioritized enforcement.

    Question 4 would have legalized personal use of psilocybin and four other natural psychedelics for adults 21+ and established a regulated therapeutic framework. It failed roughly 43-57.

    Decriminalized / deprioritized

    Somerville, Cambridge, Northampton, Easthampton, Amherst, Medford, Salem, Provincetown

    Legislation

    • Question 4 (Nov 2024)Natural Psychedelic Substances Act; rejected by voters.
    Last reviewed 01 Jun 2026
  • Virginia

    VA
    Recent failure

    Multiple decriminalization and research bills (SB 932, HB 898) have stalled in recent sessions. SB 1135 (Boysko), which would have authorized an FDA-approved psilocybin pharmaceutical analog upon federal rescheduling, was vetoed by Gov. Spanberger in April 2026.

    Legislation

    • SB 1135 (2026)Conditional psilocybin pharmaceutical-analog authorization; vetoed April 2026.
    • SB 932 / HB 898Decrim / research framework; stalled.
    Last reviewed 01 Jun 2026
  • West Virginia

    WV
    Recent failure

    Psilocybin is a Schedule I substance. SB 906, which would have authorized lawful prescription and distribution of an FDA-approved crystalline-polymorph psilocybin contingent on federal approval, completed legislative action but was vetoed by Gov. Morrisey in the April 2026 round.

    Legislation

    • SB 906 (2026)Conditional FDA-approved psilocybin authorization; vetoed April 2026.
    Last reviewed 01 Jun 2026

Jurisdiction

Canada

Drug control in Canada is primarily federal. Most of the action below sits at the level of Health Canada and the courts, with comparatively little provincial reform.

§ 04Federal Law & the Special Access Program

Psilocybin and psilocin are Schedule III controlled substances under Canada’s Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA). Unauthorized possession, cultivation, production, and sale remain criminal offences nationwide.

On 5 January 2022, Health Canada amended the Food and Drug Regulations to make psilocybin (and MDMA) once again accessible through the Special Access Program (SAP), a pathway that had been closed since 2013. Under the SAP, physicians may request authorization for a specific patient with a serious or life-threatening condition where conventional treatments have failed or are unsuitable — predominantly end-of-life distress in terminal cancer patients and treatment-resistant depression.

A class exemption under section 56(1) of the CDSA covers the supply chain — practitioners, pharmacists, hospitals, and licensed dealers handling psilocybin tied to an SAP authorization — removing the need for an individual exemption at each link. A separate class exemption authorizes at-home administration of psilocybin and MDMA by participants in approved clinical trials.

Bill C-5 (2022) removed mandatory minimums for several CDSA offences and encouraged prosecutorial diversion for simple possession. It is not psilocybin-specific but lowered the floor for personal-possession prosecutions across the schedule.

§ 05Litigation & Reform Efforts

TheraPsil’s Charter challenge (2022– ) — Asection 7 Charter challenge brought by TheraPsil and six patient plaintiffs argues that the lack of timely psilocybin access for end-of-life and treatment-resistant cases violates security of the person. The case remains in pre-trial / procedural stages with no merits ruling as of June 2026.

Federal Court of Appeal, June 19, 2025 — psilocybin training exemptions. The court ruled that Health Canada’s 2022 refusals of section 56(1) exemptions for ~96 healthcare practitioners seeking experiential psilocybin training were “unreasonable” given the agency’s prior 2020 grants. Applications were remanded for redetermination. The ruling does not guarantee any specific outcome, but it constrains arbitrary refusal.

Jody Lance (Calgary, 2024) — the Federal Court ordered Health Canada to reconsider his section 56 application for cluster-headache treatment; he subsequently received an exemption.

Sanctuaire de la Gratitude (Quebec) — filed a Federal Court application in October 2024 to compel a decision on its 2022 ceremonial-psilocybin exemption request. No disposition has been reported as of June 2026. Note: ayahuasca-using churches (Santo Daime, União do Vegetal) hold long-standing section 56 exemptions; no psilocybin religious exemption has yet been granted.

§ 06Provincial & Municipal

Alberta — In January 2023, Alberta became the first province to regulate psychedelic-assisted therapy. Its Mental Health Services Protection Act regime requires licensed psychiatrist oversight for psilocybin, MDMA, LSD, mescaline, DMT, 5-MeO-DMT, and ketamine. In practice the framework mostly governs ketamine clinics, since only ketamine is federally approved as a medicine; psilocybin still requires SAP or section 56 to be legally sourced.

British Columbia — The federal section 56(1) exemption that decriminalized small-quantity personal possession of opioids, cocaine, MDMA, and methamphetamine expired 31 January 2026and was not renewed. The pilot’s drug list did not include psilocybin, but the reversal reflects the broader political direction. Vancouver has long tolerated open psilocybin storefronts; the VPD has periodically raided dispensaries since late 2023, with shops typically reopening within days.

Other provinces & municipalities — A May 2024 count identified roughly 57 psilocybin dispensaries operating across 15 Canadian cities, primarily in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal. Enforcement is sporadic and locally variable. No other province has enacted a psychedelic-specific regulatory framework as of June 2026.

§Authoritative Trackers

For verification and real-time updates, the references below are the standard sources. They are independently maintained and track bill progress, regulatory decisions, and litigation faster than this page can.

United States

Canada

The codex is maintained by its readers. If an entry on this page is out of date or wrong, send corrections with a citation and we will update it.